20VC: Benchmark's Newest General Partner Ev Randle on Why Margins...
The Twenty Minute VC (20VC)Full Title
20VC: Benchmark's Newest General Partner Ev Randle on Why Margins Matter Less in AI | Why Mega Funds Will Not Produce Good Returns | OpenAI vs Anthropic: What Happens and Who Wins Coding | Investing Lessons from Peter Thiel and Mamoon Hamid
Summary
The episode features Everett Randle, a new General Partner at Benchmark, discussing investment strategies in the AI era.
Key themes include the evolving VC landscape, lessons learned from prominent investors, the unique characteristics of AI companies versus SaaS, and Benchmark's approach to investing despite differing fund sizes and strategies compared to mega-funds.
Key Points
- Benchmark's investment strategy focuses on being the closest and most impactful partner to founders while aiming for the highest money-on-money returns for LPs, irrespective of ownership percentage, adapting to current asset class realities.
- There's a need for a new taxonomy for AI companies, as their financial metrics and business models differ significantly from traditional SaaS, particularly concerning gross margins due to inference costs.
- Learning from mentors like Mary Meeker, Peter Thiel, and Mamoon Hamid provided valuable insights on using quantitative data to drive narratives, testing conviction through firm structure, and developing impeccable taste in identifying exceptional founders and products.
- The mega-fund model, driven by capital velocity and the need to deploy large checks, may not always yield the best fund-level returns compared to smaller, more focused funds like Benchmark, which prioritize deeper relationships and potentially higher cash-on-cash returns.
- The VC industry is bifurcating between high-velocity, lower-touch "Tiger-like" models and high-touch, craft-focused firms like Benchmark, with a potential "dead zone" for mid-sized firms lacking a clear strategy.
- The success of AI companies will be driven by technology and talent scarcity, not solely distribution, as building exceptional AI products is complex and requires specialized expertise, creating a strong moat.
- Early-stage investing requires a focus on people and product quality, while later stages are more influenced by market size, but the ability to adapt and pivot is crucial for long-term success.
- The definition of a "golden category" may expand due to AI, as it can create significant net new ARR by touching labor forces and enhancing efficiency across various sectors.
- The transition of human labor budgets to AI software spend is a key indicator of future economic shifts and the success of AI companies.
- Investors should focus on gross profit dollars per customer and gross margin projections for AI companies over a longer time horizon, rather than solely comparing them to SaaS metrics.
- The critical success factor for AI companies is differentiation from foundational models and labs, offering distinct workflows and value propositions to justify their pricing.
- Large tech companies are increasingly being valued on their ability to drive absolute gross profit per customer, even with lower gross margins, similar to AWS's success.
- The venture capital industry is not commoditized; firms with strong, differentiated strategies and exceptional talent will continue to thrive, with a focus on building truly valuable companies.
- The "AI inference cloud" business model, initially perceived as a commodity reselling play, has proven to be a significant market opportunity due to immense demand, justifying potentially lower margins.
- While mega-funds might struggle to achieve the same money-on-money returns as smaller, focused funds, their absolute dollar returns can still be substantial, making fund size and strategy alignment crucial for LPs.
- Benchmark's approach emphasizes being a valuable partner to founders and delivering exceptional returns by focusing on the best companies, rather than adhering to a specific ownership percentage or stage.
- The firm's success is built on its team's individual investing styles, guided by core North Stars of LP returns and founder partnership, allowing flexibility in stage and sector focus.
- The shift from human labor budgets to AI software spend represents a significant economic transition, with AI poised to drive GDP growth and societal prosperity by increasing efficiency.
- The key to navigating the current AI boom and potential downturn is to remain disciplined, focus on fundamental value, and maintain flexible fund structures to weather market volatility.
- Mega-funds may face challenges in day-to-day operations due to large teams and limited coverage per investor, potentially leading to a focus on "local maxima" rather than the absolute best opportunities.
- Founders seek partners who push them and provide constructive criticism, rather than "yes-men," and the best VCs are those who can offer this balance.
- Investing in companies with strong usage metrics and developer engagement is critical for AI product improvement and long-term success, as these factors drive rapid advancement.
- Founders Fund's ability to incubate companies and produce exceptional returns makes it a highly desirable firm for LPs seeking differentiated outcomes.
- A "missed" investment in a high-growth company like OpenAI at an early stage can be painful, highlighting the importance of not letting structural concerns overshadow fundamental potential.
- Stasis and a lack of adaptation to evolving market dynamics pose the greatest threat to established venture capital firms like Benchmark.
- Benchmark's success hinges on its ability to maintain relationships with the best companies and founders, which serves as the primary currency in the venture capital asset class.
- While AI has the potential to disrupt many industries, the "AI inference cloud" sector has shown strong performance due to overwhelming demand, suggesting that business quality concerns may be secondary for now.
- The VC industry's success is measured by the quality of its portfolio companies and the returns generated for LPs, with a focus on finding "generational" companies.
- The greatest threat to Benchmark's long-term success is stagnation, emphasizing the need to remain adaptable and focused on securing partnerships with top-tier companies.
- The venture capital industry is not commoditized, and firms with strong, differentiated strategies and talent will continue to produce superior returns.
- The focus should be on identifying companies with strong usage and developer engagement, as these are key indicators of AI product improvement and market leadership.
- Founders at Benchmark are unlikely to regret their partnership, suggesting a strong track record of positive founder relationships and value creation.
Conclusion
The venture capital industry is undergoing a significant shift, with AI companies requiring new evaluation frameworks beyond traditional SaaS metrics.
Firms like Benchmark, with their focused strategy and commitment to founders, are well-positioned to navigate market changes and deliver strong returns, even if their approach differs from mega-funds.
AI is expected to be a major driver of economic growth, increasing productivity and prosperity, and it is crucial for investors to identify companies that can capture this potential while remaining adaptable to market volatility.
Discussion Topics
- How do venture capital firms adapt their strategies to the unique financial characteristics of AI companies compared to traditional SaaS businesses?
- What are the key lessons learned from experienced investors like Peter Thiel and Mamoon Hamid that are most relevant for emerging VC professionals today?
- With the increasing prevalence of AI, how should the venture capital industry redefine its core metrics for success and its approach to building long-term relationships with founders?
Key Terms
- LPs
- Limited Partners, typically institutional investors like pension funds and endowments that commit capital to venture capital funds.
- Capital Velocity
- A strategy in venture capital focused on investing capital rapidly to maximize the number of deals and potentially achieve higher overall returns, even if individual deal returns are lower.
- Golden Category
- A market segment that experiences significant net new Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) growth in a single year, indicating a high-growth opportunity for investors.
- TAM
- Total Addressable Market, the total market demand for a product or service.
- Net New ARR
- Net New Annual Recurring Revenue, the increase in predictable revenue over a year.
- NPS
- Net Promoter Score, a metric used to gauge customer loyalty and satisfaction.
- Conways Law
- A concept stating that organizations design systems that mirror their own communication structure, often applied to software development and team organization.
- GP
- General Partner, the active managers of a venture capital fund who make investment decisions and manage portfolio companies.
- SaaS
- Software as a Service, a software distribution model where a third-party provider hosts applications and makes them available to customers over the Internet.
- AI Inference
- The process of using a trained AI model to make predictions or decisions on new data.
- Coggs
- Cost of Goods Sold, the direct costs attributable to the production or purchase of the goods sold by a company.
- VC
- Venture Capital, financing that investors provide for startup companies and small businesses that are believed to have long-term growth potential.
Timeline
Discussion on the need for a new taxonomy for AI companies, diverging from traditional SaaS metrics.
Ev Randle shares lessons learned from investors like Mary Meeker, Peter Thiel, and Mamoon Hamid regarding quantitative analysis, firm structure, and developing investment taste.
Randle discusses a personal investing mistake regarding OpenAI, highlighting the risk of focusing on structural details over fundamental potential.
The conversation shifts to the unique financial metrics of AI companies, particularly gross margins, and why they differ from SaaS.
Randle explains why mega-funds may not always produce superior returns compared to smaller, focused firms like Benchmark, due to different strategic priorities.
Discussion on Benchmark's strategy of focusing on founder relationships and cash-on-cash returns, rather than just ownership percentages.
Randle addresses the question of whether Benchmark needs to expand its investment stages to stay relevant in the current market.
The importance of ignoring market noise and focusing on the intrinsic value and potential of an investment, even at early stages.
The role of financial models in venture capital, primarily as a tool to test conviction rather than predict outcomes.
Randle prioritizes people, then product, then market, emphasizing that people are the most critical factor in a startup's success.
Discussion on Doug Leone's view of venture capital becoming commoditized and Randle's counter-argument.
Randle explains why working in a mega-fund might not be as appealing as it seems, citing issues with coverage and career progression.
Randle discusses the pressure of being a Benchmark GP and the relief that comes from a less-than-perfect first investment.
A reflection on the excesses of 2021 and the importance of weathering market downturns.
Randle expresses a change of mind regarding the quality of AI cloud business models.
Randle identifies companies that have raised significant capital without tangible products as potential high-risk investments.
A comparison of Benchmark, Founders Fund, and Bond, with a focus on Founders Fund's ability to incubate companies and generate strong returns.
Randle recounts the moment he decided to join Benchmark, describing it as a childhood fantasy fulfilled.
Randle identifies missing the OpenAI $32 billion round as his biggest investment miss.
The biggest threat to Benchmark's success is identified as stasis and a failure to adapt.
A discussion on the "best picker" at Benchmark, highlighting Peter Fenton and Eric for their exceptional skills.
Randle expresses optimism about AI driving economic growth and improving societal prosperity.
Randle discusses the concept of capital velocity as a North Star for venture capital firms and how Benchmark differs.
Randle reflects on his own relationship with price and how his growth investing background informs his early-stage decisions.
Randle discusses the concept of outcome scenario planning and its limitations in venture capital.
(1:00:39) Randle believes AI will continue to expand outcome sizes, leading to significant returns for investors.
(1:01:01) Randle breaks down the three stakeholders in venture capital: LPs, founders, and GPs, and how Benchmark serves them.
(1:04:01) Randle explains why working in a mega-fund can be challenging, despite its perceived perks.
(1:06:33) Randle shares advice on the pressure of making the first investment as a Benchmark GP.
(1:07:39) Randle discusses a "missed" investment in OpenAI at an early stage.
(1:18:35) Randle identifies "stasis" as the biggest threat to Benchmark's future success.
(1:19:23) Randle names Peter Fenton and Eric as Benchmark's top "pickers."
(1:20:43) Randle expresses optimism about AI's potential to drive economic growth and societal well-being.
(1:00:05) Randle discusses the unconscious focus on capital velocity as a primary strategy for many firms, even if not explicitly stated.
(1:02:34) Randle contrasts the ability of different firms to generate venture-like returns.
(1:09:17) Randle praises Matt Ventanen as an underrated venture capitalist for his work with companies like Trade Republic and Dollar App.
(1:10:32) Randle reflects on the excesses of 2021 and the importance of weathering market downturns.
(1:13:28) Randle discusses Benchmark's ability to attract LPs and maintain its investment strategy.
(1:14:17) Randle changes his mind about the quality of AI cloud business models.
(1:15:15) Randle identifies companies that have raised significant capital without tangible products as potentially vulnerable.
(1:17:24) Randle shares his decision-making process for joining Benchmark.
(1:18:14) Randle identifies missing the OpenAI $32 billion round as his biggest investment miss.
(1:18:35) Randle believes "stasis" is the greatest risk to Benchmark's long-term success.
(1:19:23) Randle names Peter Fenton and Eric as Benchmark's top "pickers."
(1:20:43) Randle expresses optimism about AI's role in economic growth and societal well-being.
Episode Details
- Podcast
- The Twenty Minute VC (20VC)
- Episode
- 20VC: Benchmark's Newest General Partner Ev Randle on Why Margins Matter Less in AI | Why Mega Funds Will Not Produce Good Returns | OpenAI vs Anthropic: What Happens and Who Wins Coding | Investing Lessons from Peter Thiel and Mamoon Hamid
- Official Link
- https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/
- Published
- November 10, 2025