Back to The Twenty Minute VC (20VC)

20VC: Inside Accel's $4BN Growth Investing Machine | Cursor is...

The Twenty Minute VC (20VC)

Full Title

20VC: Inside Accel's $4BN Growth Investing Machine | Cursor is Dead is Total BS: Here is Why | What Missing Rippling and ElevenLabs Taught Us | Are $2BN-$10BN IPOs Dead | Why Now is a Great Time to be Thoma Bravo with Miles Clements

Summary

Miles Clements from Accel discusses evaluating AI companies based on time to value and durability, and defends Cursor against claims of being obsolete, highlighting its agent product's success.

The conversation delves into Accel's growth investing strategy, the evolving venture landscape, the importance of founder conviction, and the nuances of navigating current market conditions.

Key Points

  • AI companies are best evaluated by their time to value and the durability of that value, with coding AI like Cursor excelling in both aspects.
  • Despite public sentiment and criticism, Cursor is not dead, evidenced by its significant ARR growth and the strong adoption of its agent product, which is expanding the market for AI coding tools.
  • Accel's investment philosophy embraces nuance and multi-strategy approaches, rejecting a focus solely on extreme AI valuations or sitting out due to high prices, and believes in investing across different stages.
  • The increasing size of successful outcomes in the market necessitates that funds target large potential exits, and while growth is critical, other factors like founder quality and market opportunity remain vital.
  • Vertical SaaS companies with strong growth profiles, even if not exhibiting hyper-growth, can still be attractive investments when considering the overall portfolio and potential for significant outcomes.
  • The venture capital industry's approach to investment is evolving, with a greater emphasis on understanding the "marginal ease of ARR accumulation" and building sustainable growth mechanisms.
  • While AI companies like Anthropic and OpenAI are operating on a different plane with potential for trillion-dollar valuations, it's crucial not to ascribe these characteristics to all Series A investments.
  • Accel maintains a rigorous self-assessment process, holding regular off-sites to analyze missed opportunities and correct course, with a goal of increasing coverage and win rates.
  • The importance of founder conviction and ethical principles is highlighted, even when faced with commercial pressures, suggesting that positive behavior can lead to rewards.
  • The conversation touches on the difficulty of evaluating service-based businesses with high ARR multiples and the ongoing debate about the benefits of public versus private markets.
  • The venture capital firm Accel has evolved its strategy to adapt to the changing market, focusing on identifying outlier founders and supporting them through various stages of growth.
  • The concept of "luck" plays a role in venture capital, but it is often intertwined with ethical decision-making and principles.
  • The current public markets are seen as irrational due to the casino-like environment, making it difficult for early-stage investors to operate effectively there.
  • The best venture capital investors are those who embrace nuance, understand portfolio theory, and can identify companies with significant potential, even if their growth isn't exponential.
  • The importance of the "art" of investing—knowing when to break the rules—is emphasized, particularly in the current dynamic market.
  • The "marginal ease of ARR accumulation" is a key metric, referring to the downstream levers that enable future growth beyond initial marketing spend.
  • The current market for IPOs in the $2 billion to $10 billion range is challenging, leading many good companies to delay going public until they can reach a more robust valuation threshold.
  • The firm's approach to managing its portfolio into public markets involves a disciplined strategy of identifying outlier founders and supporting them for the long term, rather than a blanket approach to all companies.
  • The definition of a "Series A" has evolved, requiring investors to carefully consider different subcategories and make strategic decisions about which rounds to participate in.
  • The success of companies like CrowdStrike demonstrates the value of long-term commitment and belief in founders, even when opportunities for early liquidity arise.
  • Venture firms should focus on their core strengths, whether it's early-stage investing or another niche, rather than chasing momentum without a clear strategy.
  • The concept of "hope and pray" is not a viable strategy in venture capital, and firms must have clear plans for achieving significant outcomes.
  • While many venture firms missed early investments in foundational model companies, Accel has actively worked to correct this by investing in related areas and learning from those misses.
  • The nature of venture capital investment is evolving, with a greater emphasis on multi-stage funds and the ability to support companies throughout their lifecycle.
  • The core of venture capital lies in identifying and supporting outlier founders who can achieve massive outcomes, necessitating a focus on significant exit potentials.
  • The role of a venture investor is to be a valuable sounding board for founders on major strategic decisions, not to micromanage daily operations.
  • The best board members are those who offer wisdom and humility in their feedback, rather than those who are overly vocal or self-important.
  • The firm highlights its team's strengths, naming specific individuals for their expertise in sourcing, picking, and winning deals.
  • The key to success for new venture capitalists is professionalism, maintaining high standards over extended periods.
  • The firm acknowledges missing out on key companies like Oweather Labs and Shiv, which it regrets.
  • A significant win for the firm was securing the investment in Linear, which was particularly meaningful on a personal level for Miles Clements.
  • The excitement for the future lies in the flourishing of the younger team at Accel, recognizing their talent and potential.

Conclusion

Venture investing requires a nuanced approach, balancing hyper-growth opportunities with other critical factors like founder conviction and market dynamics.

The importance of self-reflection and continuous improvement is paramount in the venture capital industry, as firms must adapt to market shifts and learn from both successes and failures.

The future of venture capital will likely involve continued innovation in AI and other emerging technologies, requiring investors to be forward-thinking and embrace new strategies.

Discussion Topics

  • How do you evaluate the true value of AI companies, considering the rapid evolution of technology and the durability of their solutions?
  • What are the most significant shifts you see in venture capital investing strategies in the current market, and how should founders adapt?
  • Beyond funding, what are the most impactful ways venture capital firms can support founders and help them navigate the complexities of building a successful company?

Key Terms

ARR
Annual Recurring Revenue. A measure of a company's predictable revenue over a year.
Series A
The first round of venture capital funding for a startup, typically after seed funding, used to scale operations.
IPO
Initial Public Offering. The process by which a private company becomes public by selling shares to the public.
LBO
Leveraged Buyout. An acquisition of another company using a significant amount of borrowed money (debt).
CAC
Customer Acquisition Cost. The total cost to acquire a new customer.
ARR accumulation
The process and ease with which a company generates recurring revenue over time.
Founder conviction
A founder's strong belief in their company's vision and strategy, even in the face of challenges.
Portfolio theory
A framework for constructing investment portfolios to balance risk and reward.

Timeline

00:04:42

Discussion on how to ascertain true value in an AI world where technology is transient and revenue is endurable.

00:06:31

Debate over whether Cursor is "dead" despite its significant ARR, with arguments presented on market expansion and user adoption.

00:08:57

Examination of Cursor's reliance on Anthropic and its impact on costs, with a focus on its multi-model capabilities.

00:10:05

Discussion on whether Cursor was wrong to focus on building its own models and the potential for specialized coding models.

00:10:40

Analysis of Accel's initial investment in Cursor at a $9.5 valuation and the underwriting of its upside potential as a platform company.

00:11:48

Conversation about whether the "triple, triple, double, double" growth model is dead in light of companies like Cursor achieving massive growth.

00:13:58

How revenue predictions are viewed as a reflection of business assumptions rather than strict targets in venture investing.

00:14:10

The debate on whether companies with "triple, triple, double, double" growth profiles should be dismissed.

00:15:41

The importance of embracing nuance and multi-strategy approaches in venture capital, rather than flocking to extremes.

00:16:14

Discussion on whether Accel's fund sizes are too large to embrace nuance, and the increasing size of market outcomes.

00:17:40

Agreement on the need for large outcomes and the shift in how venture capital funds are structured to achieve them.

00:18:08

The realization that chasing specific valuation metrics led to missing out on opportunities like Service Titan.

00:18:48

The paradoxical nature of investing in a platform company like Cursor while also considering a "narrow-minded" framing of market winners.

00:19:27

The argument that the forces of capitalism do not permit true monopoly markets, even for dominant companies.

00:20:01

Discussion on whether companies like NVIDIA, Apple, and Salesforce operate in monopoly markets.

00:20:25

The venture framing of companies like Deal and Rippling, and how it can be oversimplified.

00:21:11

The concept of "marginal ease of ARR accumulation" and its importance in evaluating businesses.

00:23:11

The ongoing debate about whether to break rules on ownership for fast-growing AI companies at Series A.

00:24:01

The importance of sticking to rules versus breaking them in venture investing, with a focus on the evolving definition of Series A.

00:24:36

Discussion on areas where there was marginal ease of ARR accumulation and what was missed.

00:25:26

The realization that current benchmarks are largely obsolete, emphasizing the need to understand product usage intensity.

00:26:17

The passion for the venture industry and the thrill of chasing founders and deals.

00:26:41

Accel's self-reflection on missing out on foundational model companies like Anthropic and OpenAI.

00:27:43

The rigorous process of self-assessment and strategic review within Accel's partnership.

00:28:22

The contrast between Accel's coverage game and other VC firms' approaches to managing deal flow.

00:29:00

Discussion on win rates in venture capital and the idea that not losing any deals might mean not chasing competitive enough opportunities.

00:30:00

The joy of finding founders with non-consensus ideas and the continued existence of bootstrap companies.

00:31:14

The question of whether Accel's growth fund is subscale and how to think about fund sizes and market opportunities.

00:31:40

The evolution of venture capital from taking large ownership stakes to "laddering up" through various funding rounds to achieve desired ownership.

00:32:45

The debate on whether venture capital requires swinging for the fences versus focusing on singles and doubles.

00:33:58

The acknowledgment that most investors are, to some extent, momentum chasing, particularly in areas like AI and defense.

00:34:33

The strategy behind investing in companies like Anthropic, where momentum and business logic are both clear.

00:35:04

The danger of applying the characteristics of mega-cap AI companies to smaller Series A investments.

00:37:46

The discussion on companies that have performed poorly due to high valuations and the importance of founder-led businesses.

00:38:10

The current market has humbled many companies, with many of the greatest from recent years being oversold.

00:39:38

The question of whether founders are essential for long-term company success and the role of professional CEOs.

00:40:19

A significant change of mind for Miles Clements is the belief that not all generational AI investments have been made.

00:41:04

The Scale AI exit and the firm's focus on continuous work and improvement.

00:41:50

Difficulty in analyzing the market for service-based businesses and the value of different revenue multiples.

00:42:30

The benefits of being private versus public, with founders staying private longer to access liquidity and M&A currency.

00:43:30

The challenging IPO market for companies in the $2 billion to $10 billion range, leading to a wait for a clearer path to a $5 billion threshold.

00:44:19

The market's valuation of future cash flows and terminal value, leading to an over-rotation in the current environment.

00:44:49

The idea of seeking liquidity for investors when available, particularly in companies with high valuations, but emphasizing that it's situational.

00:45:53

The contrast between seeking liquidity in situations like WeWork versus Miro.

00:47:15

The role of venture firms in managing the book into public markets versus a distributor LP model.

00:48:27

Identifying the best sourcer and picker within Accel, and the importance of winning deals.

00:49:00

The debate on whether the best founders actually need investor help, and the role of investors as sounding boards for big decisions.

00:50:00

The importance of being a good board member, focusing on humility and wisdom.

00:51:29

A rapid-fire round of favorite seed, Series A, and growth funds, and the criteria for choosing them.

00:53:31

Hypothetical additions to a team, focusing on influential figures in the venture capital space.

00:54:34

Advice for those starting a career in venture capital, emphasizing professionalism and learning from mentors.

00:55:24

Discussion on missed deals, including Oweather Labs and Shiv, and the most satisfying wins, such as Linear.

00:58:20

The common experience of receiving numerous intro requests for promising companies.

00:58:54

Excitement for the future lies in watching the younger team at Accel flourish and achieve success.

Episode Details

Podcast
The Twenty Minute VC (20VC)
Episode
20VC: Inside Accel's $4BN Growth Investing Machine | Cursor is Dead is Total BS: Here is Why | What Missing Rippling and ElevenLabs Taught Us | Are $2BN-$10BN IPOs Dead | Why Now is a Great Time to be Thoma Bravo with Miles Clements
Published
March 9, 2026